Opinion
March 14, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.).
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the division's investigation was not abbreviated or one-sided, and she was given a full opportunity to submit evidence in support of the claim of sex discrimination. Therefore, the resulting record before the division did afford a reasonable basis for an administrative determination of this claim (see, Matter of Verderber v Roechling Steel, 110 A.D.2d 705; Matter of Friel v. McCall, 109 A.D.2d 741). Further, it cannot be said that the division's finding of no probable cause with regard to the petitioner's sex discrimination claim was unsupported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Verderber v. Roechling Steel, supra; Matter of Friel v. McCall, supra).
In addition, there is no evidence in the record to support the petitioner's claim that the division violated lawful procedure (see, Executive Law § 297; Matter of State Univ. v. State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 93 A.D.2d 742; cf., Matter of Young v Board of Educ., 100 A.D.2d 515).
We have considered the petitioner's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.