From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mason v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 18, 2002
834 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

certifying the same question as in Bates

Summary of this case from Bates v. State

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-3839

Opinion filed October 18, 2002.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Maynard F. Swanson, Jr., Judge.


Perry Dean Mason challenges the trial court's order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.

In his motion, Mason alleged that his plea was involuntary because defense counsel affirmatively misadvised him regarding the future sentencing-enhancing effects of the plea in regard to an as yet uncommitted crime. In Stansel v. State, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D1947 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 28, 2002), we held that this claim is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. We certify the same question that we certified in Stansel. We affirm, without discussion, any other issues raised by Mason in his motion.

ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Mason v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 18, 2002
834 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

certifying the same question as in Bates

Summary of this case from Bates v. State
Case details for

Mason v. State

Case Details

Full title:PERRY DEAN MASON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 18, 2002

Citations

834 So. 2d 224 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Bates v. State

her because the district court certified the same question as in this case or because it certified a conflict…