From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mashley v. Kerr

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1979
47 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Argued May 4, 1979

Decided June 14, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, ARTHUR C. AULISI, J.

Ernest Abdella and George Abdella for appellant.

Richard T. Horigan for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The trial record testimony does not reveal why plaintiff failed to produce certain medical witnesses. In this circumstance, the court's charge relative to what inferences may be drawn from such failure was proper (see PJI 1:75). Likewise, the court's ruling to receive in evidence certain exhibits consisting of accident reports made by the investigating officer may not be disturbed in view of a failure to make timely objection to their receipt, or to take proper exception thereto, other than with respect to the diagram and then on the ground of lack of personal knowledge on the part of the witness, an objection which was promptly obviated and accordingly properly overruled. Thus, in the absence of any preserved claimed errors, the order should be affirmed.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Mashley v. Kerr

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 14, 1979
47 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

Mashley v. Kerr

Case Details

Full title:BONITA B. MASHLEY, Appellant, v. JOHN KERR et al., Respondents, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 14, 1979

Citations

47 N.Y.2d 892 (N.Y. 1979)
419 N.Y.S.2d 476
393 N.E.2d 471

Citing Cases

Clarke v. Toure

It is well established that such a charge should be given where the witness is under the plaintiff’s control…

Zeeck v. Melina Taxi Co.

The jury ultimately found Melina liable to the plaintiffs. A missing witness charge should be given where the…