From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maryland for the Use of Levin v. United States

U.S.
Nov 22, 1965
382 U.S. 159 (1965)

Summary

explaining that state National Guards are commanded and administered by the states

Summary of this case from Stanford v. United States

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

No. 345, October Term, 1964.

Rehearing and motion to remand granted November 22, 1965.

381 U.S. 41, vacated and amended; 329 F.2d 722, modified and remanded for further proceedings on unresolved issues in complaint.

Theodore E. Wolcott for petitioners.

Solicitor General Marshall, former Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander, Nathan Lewin and David L. Rose for the United States.

Louis G. Davidson, Richard W. Galiher, William E. Stewart, Jr., and Peter J. McBreen, as amici curiae, urging reversal.


The petition for rehearing and the motion to remand for trial on unresolved issues are granted as herein indicated. The judgment of this Court of May 3, 1965, 381 U.S. 41, is vacated, and in lieu thereof the following judgment is entered: "The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is modified to direct that the case be remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for further proceedings with respect to the unresolved issues tendered in petitioners' bill of complaint, and is in all other respects affirmed."

It is so ordered.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, believing that a remand is legally unjustified, dissent from that part of the Court's order.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Maryland for the Use of Levin v. United States

U.S.
Nov 22, 1965
382 U.S. 159 (1965)

explaining that state National Guards are commanded and administered by the states

Summary of this case from Stanford v. United States
Case details for

Maryland for the Use of Levin v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MARYLAND FOR THE USE OF LEVIN ET AL. v . UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 22, 1965

Citations

382 U.S. 159 (1965)
86 S. Ct. 305

Citing Cases

Feit v. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp.

Kohler v. Kohler Co., 319 F.2d 634, 642 (7th Cir. 1963) (emphasis added). See Chasins v. Smith, Barney Co.,…

State of Maryland v. Capital Airlines, Inc.

In fact, as to liability, the parties in the Pennsylvania cases proceeded on the transcript of the trial of…