From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Patel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 4, 2021
192 A.D.3d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

13277 Index No. 20680/16 Case No. 2020-02763

03-04-2021

Socorro MARTINEZ, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Rajni P. PATEL, Defendant–Respondent, Little Lisa Bus Co., et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Bamundo Zwal Schermerhorn & Caffrey LLP, New York ( Bartholomew T. Russo of counsel), for appellants. Law Office of Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York ( Arnold E. DiJoseph of counsel), for Socorro Martinez, respondent. James G. Bilello & Associates, Hicksville (Susan J. Mitola of counsel), for Rajni P. Patel, respondent.


Bamundo Zwal Schermerhorn & Caffrey LLP, New York ( Bartholomew T. Russo of counsel), for appellants.

Law Office of Arnold E. DiJoseph, P.C., New York ( Arnold E. DiJoseph of counsel), for Socorro Martinez, respondent.

James G. Bilello & Associates, Hicksville (Susan J. Mitola of counsel), for Rajni P. Patel, respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Kennedy, Scarpulla, Shulman, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John R. Higgitt, J.), entered February 18, 2020, which denied the motion of defendants Little Lisa Bus Co. Inc. and Rafael Polanco for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was injured while she was a passenger on a disabled school bus on the southbound right lane of the Bronx River Parkway, which was owned by defendant Little Lisa Bus Co. Inc. and driven by defendant Rafael A. Polanco, when it was rear-ended by a motor vehicle driven by defendant Rajni P. Patel.

Plaintiff testified that the bus was moving at about 20 miles per hour and came to a gradual stop in the right lane, so that Polanco had sufficient time to steer onto the right shoulder of the highway when the bus experienced mechanical problems. This evidence conflicts with Polanco's testimony that the bus stopped abruptly and he was unable to veer it out of the right lane, and thus, raises an issue of fact as to Polanco's negligence in permitting the bus to remain disabled in a lane of travel obstructing traffic ( see Geralds v. Damiano, 128 A.D.3d 550, 551, 10 N.Y.S.3d 38 [1st Dept. 2015] ; Bah v. Benton, 92 A.D.3d 133, 135, 936 N.Y.S.2d 181 [1st Dept. 2012] ). There also issues of fact as to whether Polanco and Little Lisa Bus Co. are comparatively negligent based on the conflicting testimony regarding whether Polanco properly placed reflective triangles behind the bus and turned on the blinker lights after the accident ( see Bah, 92 A.D.3d at 135, 936 N.Y.S.2d 181 ).


Summaries of

Martinez v. Patel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Mar 4, 2021
192 A.D.3d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Martinez v. Patel

Case Details

Full title:Socorro Martinez, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Rajni P. Patel…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 4, 2021

Citations

192 A.D.3d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
192 A.D.3d 426
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 1329