From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. New York City Health Hospitals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1988
137 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

February 1, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's infant decedent died on August 1, 1981. The plaintiff was appointed as the infant decedent's personal representative on May 14, 1982. Thereafter, on December 23, 1982, the plaintiff commenced the instant action seeking recovery, inter alia, for wrongful death. The New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act (see, McKinney's Uncons Laws of N Y § 7401 [2]) requires that an action against the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation for the death of a plaintiff's decedent be commenced within one year and 90 days after the cause of action "shall have accrued". The accrual date and, therefore, the time for commencement of the action is measured from the date of death of the plaintiff's decedent (see, Brennan v City of New York, 59 N.Y.2d 791; D'Andrea v Long Is. R.R. Co., 117 A.D.2d 10, affd 70 N.Y.2d 683; Brann v City of New York, 100 A.D.2d 504). At bar, it is undisputed that the plaintiff failed to commence her action within one year and 90 days of her decedent's death. The plaintiff argues that the date of her appointment as administratrix should be deemed to be the accrual date from which the limitations period commences to run. While acknowledging that Brennan v City of New York (supra) and its progeny hold to the contrary, the plaintiff urges this court to hold Brennan inapplicable to the instant action as it was commenced prior to the date of the Brennan determination. We find this argument unpersuasive. Review of the facts in Brann v City of New York (supra) reveals that that action was commenced prior to the Brennan decision but that the court followed the Brennan determination. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the respondent as untimely. Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martinez v. New York City Health Hospitals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1988
137 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Martinez v. New York City Health Hospitals

Case Details

Full title:ANA MARTINEZ, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of LUIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1988

Citations

137 A.D.2d 503 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Martinez v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp.

Decided June 2, 1988 Appeal from (2d dept: 137 A.D.2d 503) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…

Hernandez v. New York City Hlt. Hospitals

The accrual date with respect to the applicable Statute of Limitations — "one year and ninety days after the…