From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez v. Jesionowska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 2006
30 A.D.3d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8391.

June 15, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered October 13, 2005, which denied the motion by defendant Frederic Harris, M.D. and the cross motion by defendants Jesionowska, Mentus and Beth Israel Medical Center to dismiss the action as abandoned, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

McAloon Friedman, P.C., New York (Timothy J. O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for Hanna Jesionowska, M.D., Nicholas Mentus, M.D. and Beth Israel Medical Center, appellants.

Belair Evans LLP, New York (James B. Reich of counsel), for Fredric Harris, M.D., appellant.

Rubert Gross, P.C., New York (Soledad Rubert of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Sullivan and Catterson, JJ., Concur.


It is uncontested that this case, originally commenced in Queens County in 1999, was ultimately transferred to New York County in 2001 after defendants successfully moved for a change of venue. Although a note of issue was filed in Queens County prior to the transfer, there is no evidence of record that the action was entered on the trial calendar in New York County after the transfer.

A motion to dismiss an action as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3404 may be properly made only with respect to cases on the trial calendar ( Johnson v. Minskoff Sons, 287 AD2d 233). Thus, this action could not have been dismissed under CPLR 3404 because it was not on the trial calendar in New York County. Furthermore, we note that defendants never filed a 90-day notice for dismissal for want of prosecution pursuant to CPLR 3216 (b) (3) ( see Carino Italian Style v. Shammah, 266 AD2d 1). We do not condone the extensive period of inactivity in this action, but CPLR 3404 is not the appropriate device to address that failing.


Summaries of

Martinez v. Jesionowska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 2006
30 A.D.3d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Martinez v. Jesionowska

Case Details

Full title:MARIA MARTINEZ et al., Respondents, v. HANNA JESIONOWSKA, M.D., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4924
816 N.Y.S.2d 348

Citing Cases

Rosario v. Ortiz Funeral Home

Consequently, the Lopez court held that CPLR 3404 does not apply to prenote cases. The reasoning and holding…