From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinez-Mata v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 21, 2015
626 F. App'x 437 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-6770

12-21-2015

ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ-MATA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.

Alejandro Martinez-Mata, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00010-REP) Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alejandro Martinez-Mata, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alejandro Martinez-Mata appeals the district court's order denying his motion for the return of property pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Martinez-Mata, No. 3:14-cv-00010-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Martinez-Mata v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 21, 2015
626 F. App'x 437 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Martinez-Mata v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ-MATA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 21, 2015

Citations

626 F. App'x 437 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Glover v. United States

United States v. Martinez-Mata, No. 3:14CV10, 2014 WL 5430992, at *2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 24, 2014) (citation…

Bullock v. United States

Thus, a party who “lacks lawful entitlement” to forfeited property “cannot avail himself of Rule 41(g)…