From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martindale v. Kay

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 12, 1918
120 N.E. 869 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued June 6, 1918

Decided July 12, 1918

Joseph M. Hartfield and Vermont Hatch for appellants.

Samuel Sobel for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, CARDOZO and McLAUGHLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Martindale v. Kay

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 12, 1918
120 N.E. 869 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Martindale v. Kay

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH B. MARTINDALE et al., as Receivers of MILLS GIBB, Appellants, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 12, 1918

Citations

120 N.E. 869 (N.Y. 1918)
120 N.E. 869

Citing Cases

Pink v. Meyer

However, the "defendant's liability may only be measured by the duty cast upon him to make inquiry at the…

Martindale v. Evans

The complaint was brought on the theory of money had and received, but it was stipulated on the trial that if…