From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 9, 2008
No. 05-07-01041-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-07-01041-CR

Opinion Filed September 9, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F07-40067-SQ.

Before Chief Justice THOMAS and Justices WRIGHT and FRANCIS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Cody Allan Martin waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by a prior conviction, at twenty years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 9, 2008
No. 05-07-01041-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2008)
Case details for

Martin v. State

Case Details

Full title:CODY ALLAN MARTIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Sep 9, 2008

Citations

No. 05-07-01041-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 9, 2008)