From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 31, 2018
257 So. 3d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D17-3655

10-31-2018

Michael J. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Michael J. Martin, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Michael J. Martin, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DENIED .

Osterhaus and Winsor, JJ., concur; Wolf, J., dissents with opinion.

I would grant the petition for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. See Andujar-Ruiz v. State , 205 So.3d 803 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (holding appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue trial court's instruction on duty to retreat constituted fundamental error).


Summaries of

Martin v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Oct 31, 2018
257 So. 3d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Martin v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. MARTIN, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

257 So. 3d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Dixon

On October 31, 2018, Judges Osterhaus and Winsor denied the petition with no explanation. Ex. D4; Martin …