Summary
In Martin v. Silliman (53 N.Y. 615) the court held that if the plaintiff was entitled to a sum liquidated and certain, he had the right to the interest thereon; and the fact that the jury arbitrarily reduced his claim to the amount of the verdict did not, either in law or in equity, affect his right to interest upon the amount actually recovered.
Summary of this case from McAfee v. DixOpinion
Argued May 23, 1873
Decided June 3, 1873
Samuel Hand for the appellants.
B.F. Mudgett for the respondent.
ALLEN, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.