From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2019
171 A.D.3d 1322 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

526898

04-11-2019

In the Matter of Johny MARTIN, Petitioner, v. Anthony RODRIGUEZ, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Johny Martin, Collins, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Robyn P. Ryan of counsel), for respondent.


Johny Martin, Collins, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Robyn P. Ryan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Mulvey, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENTProceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats, harassing an employee, refusing a direct order, creating a disturbance and violating the regulations governing beard/mustache length. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of all charges and a penalty was imposed. The penalty subsequently was reduced and, upon petitioner's administrative appeal, the disciplinary determination and modified penalty were affirmed. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the finding of guilt, and respondent moved to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction or, in the alternative, to transfer the proceeding to this Court. Supreme Court denied respondent's motion to dismiss and transferred this proceeding.

Respondent concedes – and we agree – that the portion of the determination finding petitioner guilty of violating the regulations governing beard/mustache length is not supported by substantial evidence and must be annulled. As petitioner has served the penalty imposed and no loss of good time was recommended, we need not remit for a redetermination of the penalty on the remaining charges (see Matter of Love v. Venettozzi, 161 A.D.3d 1333, 1334, 76 N.Y.S.3d 660 [2018] ; Matter of Thompson v. Kirkpatrick, 160 A.D.3d 1234, 1235, 71 N.Y.S.3d 910 [2018] ). To the extent that petitioner's brief may be read as contesting the remaining charges, we find that the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of its author provide substantial evidence to support the finding that petitioner made threats, harassed an employee, disobeyed a direct order and created a disturbance (see Matter of Cosme v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 168 A.D.3d 1327, 1328, 92 N.Y.S.3d 745 [2019] ; Matter of Harriott v. Koenigsmann, 149 A.D.3d 1440, 1441, 53 N.Y.S.3d 401 [2017] ; Matter of Kelly v. Commissioner of Corrections & Community Supervision, 122 A.D.3d 997, 998, 994 N.Y.S.2d 486 [2014] ). Petitioner's denials, as well as his claim that the misbehavior report was written in retaliation for a grievance that he had filed against a correction sergeant, presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Cosme v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 168 A.D.3d at 1328, 92 N.Y.S.3d 745 ; Matter of Simpson v. Rodriguez, 149 A.D.3d 1448, 1449, 149 A.D.3d 1448 [2017], lv dismissed 30 N.Y.3d 1057, 69 N.Y.S.3d 586, 92 N.E.3d 809 [2018] ; Matter of Harriott v. Koenigsmann, 149 A.D.3d at 1441, 53 N.Y.S.3d 401 ). Any remaining arguments raised by petitioner have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Mulvey, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of violating the regulations governing beard/mustache length; petition granted to that extent and the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision is directed to expunge all references to this charge from petitioner's institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.


Summaries of

Martin v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 11, 2019
171 A.D.3d 1322 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Martin v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOHNY MARTIN, Petitioner, v. ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ, as Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 11, 2019

Citations

171 A.D.3d 1322 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
95 N.Y.S.3d 909
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 2763

Citing Cases

Smith v. Annucci

The misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony at the hearing constitute substantial evidence to…

Peters v. Annucci

Respondent concedes and, upon reviewing the record, we agree that that part of the determination finding…