From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Feltingoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 2004
7 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3751N.

Decided May 27, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered October 21, 2003, which apportioned 75% of the contingency fee to plaintiff's incoming attorneys, and the 25% remainder to the outgoing attorney, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Law Offices of James J. Killerlane, New York (David Samel of counsel), for appellant.

Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman Mackauf, New York (Jeffrey B. Bloom of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Marlow, JJ.


The incoming attorneys got the case mediation-ready and trial-ready by preparing and developing the damages portion, specifically, plaintiff's extensive emotional and psychological injuries arising from a horrific accident in which an out-of-control motor vehicle struck her as she dined inside a restaurant. Although the outgoing attorney may have devoted more hours to the case, time spent is just one of a number of factors to be considered in apportioning the fee. Others include quality of service and the contributions of the respective attorneys toward achieving the outcome ( Board of Mgrs. of Boro Park Vil.-Phase I Condominium v. Boro Park Townhouse Assoc., 284 A.D.2d 237), as well as the experience, ability and reputation of the attorneys ( Ebrahimian v. Long Is. R.R., 269 A.D.2d 488). Here, the quality of the incoming attorneys' work was of far greater significance in reaching the $1.9 million settlement.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Martin v. Feltingoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 2004
7 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Martin v. Feltingoff

Case Details

Full title:ELEANOR S. MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. MARSHA FELTINGOFF, ET AL., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 27, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
777 N.Y.S.2d 476

Citing Cases

Dialcom, LLC v. AT&T Corp.

Although, in determining attorneys' fees after the dismissal of an attorney, a canceled retainer contract no…

Young, Fenton, Kelsey & Brown, P.C. v. Wein

Wein and another attorney were still required to prepare for trial, unable to settle the case until after…