From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 29, 2009
07 Civ. 3911 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2009)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

finding that because the ALJ failed to apply the two-step credibility analysis, it was impossible for a reviewing court to determine where the ALJ found the claimant had failed to carry her burden

Summary of this case from Doria v. Colvin
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

07 Civ. 3911 (LAP).

July 29, 2009

ORDER

LORETTA PRESKA, District Judge

On April 22, 2009, Magistrate Judge Ellis issued a Report and Recommendation granting Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings and denying Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Objections to that Report and Recommendation were due on May 6, 2009. Having received no objections and finding Judge Ellis's decision to be correct and appropriate upon de novo review, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), his Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED.

The Clerk of the Court shall mark this action closed and all pending motions denied as moot.

SO ORDERED.

Summaries of

Martin v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 29, 2009
07 Civ. 3911 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2009)

finding that because the ALJ failed to apply the two-step credibility analysis, it was impossible for a reviewing court to determine where the ALJ found the claimant had failed to carry her burden

Summary of this case from Doria v. Colvin

noting that claimant's ability to engage in "mundane tasks of life . . . do[es] not necessarily indicate that [a claimant] is able to perform a full day of sedentary work"

Summary of this case from Burstein v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

stating that the claimant's ability to engage in "mundane tasks of life . . . do[es] not necessarily indicate that [a claimant] is able to perform a full day of sedentary work."

Summary of this case from Estela-Rivera v. Colvin

stating the claimant's ability to engage in “mundane tasks of life ... do[es] not necessarily indicate that [a claimant] is able to perform a full day of sedentary work.”

Summary of this case from Bradley v. Colvin
Case details for

Martin v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. ACTING COMMISSIONER MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, OF THE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 29, 2009

Citations

07 Civ. 3911 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Salisbury v. Colvin

Finally, "'[o]nly allegations beyond what is substantiated by medical evidence are to be subjected to a…

Rogers v. Colvin

Indeed, an ability to perform the "mundane tasks of life" does not necessarily indicate that a claimant is…

18 Citing Cases