From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Adams

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Dec 15, 2023
Civil Action 6:23-cv-24 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 15, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 6:23-cv-24

12-15-2023

NOLAN CRAIG MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN ADAMS, WARDEN CHAMBERS, MR. TOOLE, MR. MCRAE, and OFFICER SHUMAKE, Defendants.


ORDER

BENJAMIN W. CHEESBRO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants Chambers, Shumake, Toole, and McRae filed Motions for a More Definite Statement and to Sever. Docs. 42, 43. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file responses to these Motions within 14 days of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file timely responses, the Court will presume Plaintiff does not oppose the Motions and may dismiss individual claims or the entire action. See Local R. 7.5 (“Failure to respond . . . shall indicate . . . there is no opposition to a motion.”). To ensure Plaintiff's responses are made with fair notice of the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding motions for more definite statements and joinder generally, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to provide a copy of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12, 20, 21, and 41 when serving this Order upon Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Martin v. Adams

United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia
Dec 15, 2023
Civil Action 6:23-cv-24 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Martin v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:NOLAN CRAIG MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN ADAMS, WARDEN CHAMBERS, MR…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Georgia

Date published: Dec 15, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 6:23-cv-24 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 15, 2023)