From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martell v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division
Mar 25, 2008
CASE NO. 3:07-cv-83-J-25MCR (M.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2008)

Summary

refusing to consider issues not fully briefed by plaintiff's counsel and citing cases

Summary of this case from Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co.

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-83-J-25MCR.

March 25, 2008


ORDER


THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 21). recommending that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and had an opportunity to file objections. Plaintiff timely filed objections, and Defendant has filed a response to Plaintiff's objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted and the Commissioner's decision should be affirmed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 22) are OVERRULED.

2. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 21) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

3. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

4. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for the Defendant and to close this file.

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Martell v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division
Mar 25, 2008
CASE NO. 3:07-cv-83-J-25MCR (M.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2008)

refusing to consider issues not fully briefed by plaintiff's counsel and citing cases

Summary of this case from Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co.
Case details for

Martell v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DENISE L. MARTELL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE. Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division

Date published: Mar 25, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 3:07-cv-83-J-25MCR (M.D. Fla. Mar. 25, 2008)

Citing Cases

Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co.

Defendant does not provide any analysis, argument or authority for the motion to dismiss, therefore the Court…