From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marson Const. Corp. v. Illinois Union Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 10, 2000
276 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

October 10, 2000.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered July 23, 1999, which, upon plaintiff's default, granted the motion of defendants F.J. Wilkes Company and Steven Marshall to dismiss the complaint as against them as time-barred and for lack of privity, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

Anthony J. McNulty, for plaintiff-appellant.

Debra Miller Krebs, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Tom, Ellerin, Rubin, Andrias, JJ.


The purportedly appealed order, entered upon plaintiff's default in responding to defendants-respondents' motion to dismiss the complaint, is nonappealable (CPLR 5511; Batra v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 205 A.D.2d 480). In any event, were the order appealable, we would find that the complaint was properly dismissed as time-barred because plaintiff's action was commenced more than six years after defendants-respondents insurance rokers provided plaintiff with a certificate of insurance naming it as an additional insured (see,Santiago v. 1370 Broadway Assocs., 264 A.D.2d 624), and also because there was no privity between plaintiff general contractor and defendants-respondents, the insurance broker and agent for the subcontractor (St. George v. W.J. Barney Corp., 270 A.D.2d 171, 706 N.Y.S.2d 24).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Marson Const. Corp. v. Illinois Union Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 10, 2000
276 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Marson Const. Corp. v. Illinois Union Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARSON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ILLINOIS UNION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 10, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 207

Citing Cases

Wainwright v. Charlew Constr. Co.

"Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing…

Federal Ins. v. Spectrum Ins. Co.

Rather, plaintiff seeks recovery from the broker who allegedly failed to procure sufficient insurance…