From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Steinbrecher

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jan 28, 2009
759 N.W.2d 891 (Minn. 2009)

Opinion

No. A08-1673.

January 28, 2009.

T. Michael Kilbury, Peterson, Logren Kilbury, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for relators.

Lori Swanson, Atty. Gen., Rory H. Foley, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, MN, for respondent.


Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 26, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Eric J. Magnuson

Chief Justice


Summaries of

Marshall v. Steinbrecher

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jan 28, 2009
759 N.W.2d 891 (Minn. 2009)
Case details for

Marshall v. Steinbrecher

Case Details

Full title:Garrett M. MARSHALL, Employee, v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC., and…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jan 28, 2009

Citations

759 N.W.2d 891 (Minn. 2009)