From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 23, 1997
691 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-2338

Opinion filed April 23, 1997.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Stanford Blake, Judge.

LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 95-34000

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, FLETCHER, and SORONDO, JJ.


The defendant, Emmett Marshall, appeals his convictions for burglary and grand theft. We reverse, as the State failed to present sufficient evidence to prove that Marshall actually entered the dwelling, or to connect the property in Marshall's possession with the property charged in the information. See Stanley v. State, 626 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (reversing a conviction for burglary when the State failed to prove that there was an entry into the store), review denied, 634 So.2d 627 (Fla. 1994); C.O. v. State, 557 So.2d 637 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (reversing an adjudication of delinquency when the State failed to present a prima facie case that the property stolen was the same as that found in defendant's possession).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to discharge the defendant on these charges only.


Summaries of

Marshall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 23, 1997
691 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Marshall v. State

Case Details

Full title:EMMETT MARSHALL, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 23, 1997

Citations

691 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

State v. Thompson

See State v. Denton-Boyer (May 26, 1998), Clermont App. No. CA97-11-096, unreported. This was not an ordinary…