From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Sep 23, 2020
310 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2D19-2202

09-23-2020

Hiram MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James Hellickson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James Hellickson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of revocation of community control and the ensuing sentence. However, we remand for vacatur of the duplicative written judgment of guilt that was entered on May 30, 2019. See Schaufler v. State, 255 So. 3d 929, 929 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

KHOUZAM, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Marshall v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Sep 23, 2020
310 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Marshall v. State

Case Details

Full title:HIRAM MARSHALL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 23, 2020

Citations

310 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)