From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Mahoney

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
Jun 11, 2008
No. CV-07-93-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Jun. 11, 2008)

Opinion

No. CV-07-93-GF-SEH.

June 11, 2008


ORDER


On May 15, 2008, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendation in this matter. Plaintiff filed objections to Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation on May 23, 2008, and filed a motion to amend or withdraw his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on June 10, 2008.

Document No. 6

Document No. 7

The Court has fully considered Plaintiff's motion and has reviewed de novo Judge Strong's findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation and adopt them in full.

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Grant Leave to Amend or to Withdraw Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

Document No. 8

2. Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice.

Document No. 1

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED as Plaintiff alleges no facts showing he was deprived of an appeal.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Marshall v. Mahoney

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
Jun 11, 2008
No. CV-07-93-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Jun. 11, 2008)
Case details for

Marshall v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH R. MARSHALL, Plaintiff, v. MIKE MAHONEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division

Date published: Jun 11, 2008

Citations

No. CV-07-93-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Jun. 11, 2008)

Citing Cases

Dunn v. Boyd

And whether such date is shown by evidence or stipulated as a fact by the parties, can make no difference.…