From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall Ray Corporation v. Haedke Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 28, 1965
212 N.E.2d 771 (N.Y. 1965)

Summary

affirming Special Terms decision to "consider[] defendant's motion [to dismiss] as one to stay action and compel arbitration and granted said motion"

Summary of this case from Creston Ave. Baptist Church of Christ v. CMC Dev., LLC

Opinion

Argued October 18, 1965

Decided October 28, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, SIDNEY F. FOSTER, J.

Emil S. Bartle for appellant.

James T. Ronan, Ruben Schwartz and Albert Lyons for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Marshall Ray Corporation v. Haedke Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 28, 1965
212 N.E.2d 771 (N.Y. 1965)

affirming Special Terms decision to "consider[] defendant's motion [to dismiss] as one to stay action and compel arbitration and granted said motion"

Summary of this case from Creston Ave. Baptist Church of Christ v. CMC Dev., LLC
Case details for

Marshall Ray Corporation v. Haedke Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARSHALL RAY CORPORATION, Appellant, v. C. HAEDKE CO., INC., Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 28, 1965

Citations

212 N.E.2d 771 (N.Y. 1965)
212 N.E.2d 771
265 N.Y.S.2d 284

Citing Cases

Stark v. Molod Spitz Desantis

See Allied Building Inspectors International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union NO. 211, AFL-CIO v.…

Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith v. Griesenbeck

The mere fact that this order was made on a motion in a pending action does not impair its finality. (See…