From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marrero v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 2001
287 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

October 11, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs' motion to strike defendants' answer pursuant to CPLR 3126, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

David P. Horowitz, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Julian L. Kalkstein, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Wallach, Buckley, JJ.


In this medical malpractice/wrongful death action, the motion court properly exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs' motion to strike defendants' answer since the record before the court did not justify the inference that defendants' failure to complete discovery had been willful, contumacious or in bad faith (see, Tsai v. Hernandez, A.D.2d 725 N.Y.S.2d 340). Notably, the delay about which plaintiffs complain was initially attributable to their own actions and omissions. Indeed, it appears from the record that defendants made good faith efforts at completing discovery on or before the cut-off date imposed by the motion court in its conditional order dated March 23, 2000.

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Marrero v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 2001
287 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Marrero v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA MARRERO, ETC., ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE CITY OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 11, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 361

Citing Cases

Zouev v. N.Y

In this case, while we do not condone the defendant's extended delay in furnishing the requested discovery,…

Sokolnik v. Voronova

Although the attorneys for both parties affirmed that they exchanged correspondence concerning the scheduling…