From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marquez v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 27, 2016
Case No. ED CV 15-1561 MRW (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2016)

Summary

remanding so the vocational expert could explain the apparent variance between claimant's limitation on overhead reaching with his dominant right arm and DOT listings that appeared to require bilateral reaching

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Berryhill

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 15-1561 MRW

04-27-2016

ARMANDO MARQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is the judgment of this Court that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Social Security Administration on an open record for further proceedings consistent with the Court's Order. Date: April 27, 2016

/s/_________

HON. MICHAEL R. WILNER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Marquez v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 27, 2016
Case No. ED CV 15-1561 MRW (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2016)

remanding so the vocational expert could explain the apparent variance between claimant's limitation on overhead reaching with his dominant right arm and DOT listings that appeared to require bilateral reaching

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Berryhill

resolving question whether DOT minimums involved one-handed versus two-handed reaching in the case of a one-armed worker

Summary of this case from Steiner-Leach v. Berryhill
Case details for

Marquez v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO MARQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 27, 2016

Citations

Case No. ED CV 15-1561 MRW (C.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2016)

Citing Cases

Talbert v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Phillips v. Colvin, No. 14-C-0007, 2016 WL 1069952, at *6-7 (E.D. Wis. Mar. 18, 2016) (finding VE testimony…

Steiner-Leach v. Berryhill

Petitioner's argument invites the Court to engage in an analysis of whether the Dictionary of Occupational…