From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marks v. U.S.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Oct 19, 2007
Case No. C06-5696RBL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 19, 2007)

Summary

dismissing FTCA claim for failure to exhaust as "[t]he filing of a grievance at an institution is not the same as making an official tort claim demand, addressed to the proper agency"

Summary of this case from De La Cruz-Garcia v. Lucas

Opinion

Case No. C06-5696RBL.

October 19, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) Plaintiff's Motion to Stay, etc. [Dkt. #39] is DENIED.
(2) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
(3) The United States of America is dismissed from this action. The United States of America enjoys sovereign immunity from Civil Rights and Bivens actions. Further, the plaintiff has not PROPERLY exhausted his administrative remedies under 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a.) with regard to filing a Federal Tort Claim. Filing a demand for payment in a grievance to detainee officials is does not satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 2675(a). The United States is dismissed form this action and all Federal Tort Claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
(4) Michael Melendez In his official capacity is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court notes he is not named in his individual capacity.
(5) The defendants motion for an injunction preventing plaintiff from filing any future actions is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The request is premature and overly broad.
(6) The remaining defendants in this action are:
1. G. Wigen.
2. Charles Mc Burney.
3. Bill Mc Hatton, Compliance Officer.
4. Doe Portillo.
5. Doe Housden

(Dkt. # 8, page 1).

(7) The clerk's office is directed to send copies of this order to plaintiff, counsel for defendants and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.


Summaries of

Marks v. U.S.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Oct 19, 2007
Case No. C06-5696RBL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 19, 2007)

dismissing FTCA claim for failure to exhaust as "[t]he filing of a grievance at an institution is not the same as making an official tort claim demand, addressed to the proper agency"

Summary of this case from De La Cruz-Garcia v. Lucas
Case details for

Marks v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Oct 19, 2007

Citations

Case No. C06-5696RBL (W.D. Wash. Oct. 19, 2007)

Citing Cases

De La Cruz-Garcia v. Lucas

administrative remedy program does not save his FTCA claim because, as noted above, they are not one and the…

Jackson v. United States

See Cuello v. United States, 2013 WL 1338839 at *6 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2013) (describing difference between…