From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marks v. First Nat'l Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2011
No. C 11-02721 JF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-02721 JF (PR)

08-17-2011

DELANEY G. MARKS, Plaintiff, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK, et al., Defendants.


NOT FOR CITATION

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On June 6, 2011, Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On the same day, the Clerk of the Court sent Plaintiff a notice that his complaint was deficient because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or file an In Forma Pauperis Application. (Docket No. 2.) The notification included the warning that the case would be dismissed if Plaintiff failed to respond within thirty days. (Id.) The deadline has since passed, and Plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEREMY FOGEL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Marks v. First Nat'l Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 17, 2011
No. C 11-02721 JF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Marks v. First Nat'l Bank

Case Details

Full title:DELANEY G. MARKS, Plaintiff, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 17, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-02721 JF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2011)

Citing Cases

O'Neal v. Clark

In Alabama, they were held to be indorsers, prima facie at least, and within the rules of the commercial law…

McConnon Co. v. Kirby

Whether we may regard the one rule or the other as supported by the sounder reason, the Alabama rule has been…