From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Markham v. Gottsegen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 7, 1966
181 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Opinion

No. 4829.

January 7, 1966.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Clyde Kissinger, J.

C.I. Carey, of Carey Harrison, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

George H. Brown, III, St. Petersburg, for respondent.


The petitioner brought his petition as provided under Fla.App.R. 3.16, subd. c, 31 F.S.A. to review a judgment for costs entered by the lower court which provided in part, "It is ordered that, the court feeling that in all equity, the defendants' costs should not be assessed against the plaintiff, the defendants' motion be and the same is hereby denied, the plaintiff and defendant to each bear his own costs."

The respondent was the plaintiff below and the petitioner and his wife were defendants in an action whereby the lower court entered a final summary judgment in favor of the respondent. Subsequently this court rendered its opinion reversing the lower court and remanding the cause for entry of a final summary judgment in favor of the petitioner. Markham v. Gottsegen, Fla. App. 1965, 179 So.2d 100.

Under Fla. Stat. 58.04, F.S.A. and Fla. App.R. 3.16, subd. a, the petitioner is entitled to a cost judgment for the following: filing fee to the Appellate Court, $25; filing notice of appeal, $3.50; and preparation of the record on appeal by the clerk of the lower court, $42.80.

The petitioner took the discovery deposition of the respondent in the proceeding below and said deposition was filed with the lower court and used by both the lower court and this court in the disposition of the cause. Therefore, under Fla. Stat. 58.13, F.S.A. the petitioner is entitled to a judgment for the cost of the taking of the deposition of the respondent in the amount of $30.55.

All other costs for which the petitioner seeks a judgment are hereby denied and this cause is remanded to the lower court for the entry of a judgment for costs consistent with this opinion.

ALLEN, C.J., and SHANNON and HOBSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Markham v. Gottsegen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 7, 1966
181 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
Case details for

Markham v. Gottsegen

Case Details

Full title:E.A. MARKHAM, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SURVIVING HUSBAND OF ETHEL M. MARKHAM…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 7, 1966

Citations

181 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing Cases

Shuman v. State

An examination of Section 27.54 in its entirety reflects that the enactment relates solely to operation…