From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marinelli v. K-Mart Corporation

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 23, 2000
162 N.J. 516 (N.J. 2000)

Opinion

No. A-112-98.

Argued January 4, 2000.

Decided February 23, 2000.

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 318 N.J. Super. 554 (1999).

Vincent J. Ciecka argued the cause for appellants.

James D. Butler argued the cause for respondent Kyle Ford (Mr. Butler, attorney; Jeffrey Marder, on the brief).

Tricia E. Habert argued the cause for respondent John McDonough (Crawshaw, Mayfield, Turner, O'Mara, Donnelly McBride, attorneys).

Timothy J. Galanaugh argued the cause for respondent Sean McDonough (Murphy and O'Connor, attorneys).

Thomas D. Monte, Jr., argued the cause for respondent K-Mart Corporation (Monte, Sachs Borowsky, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Stern's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 318 N.J. Super. 554 (1999).

CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, and VERNIERO join in this PER CURIAM opinion.


Summaries of

Marinelli v. K-Mart Corporation

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 23, 2000
162 N.J. 516 (N.J. 2000)
Case details for

Marinelli v. K-Mart Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DOMINIC MARINELLI, a minor by and through his mother and Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 23, 2000

Citations

162 N.J. 516 (N.J. 2000)
745 A.2d 508

Citing Cases

Erny v. Russo

The fact that New York allows a greater recovery does not dictate that its laws should take priority over…

Smith v. Alza Corp.

Under the circumstances, because plaintiff purchased the Acutrim in Pennsylvania, he was thus not a consumer…