From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maric v. Adams

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 2001
749 N.E.2d 289 (Ohio 2001)

Opinion

Nos. 00-874 and 00-1148.

Submitted May 16, 2001.

Decided July 5, 2001.

Appeal from and Certified by the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 98-L-142.

Robert P. Rutter, for appellants.

Davis Young Co., L.P.A., Henry A. Hentemann and J. Michael Creagan, for appellee.


The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur in judgment.


I concur in judgment based on the reasoning set forth in my dissenting opinion in Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and in my opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part in Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur in the foregoing opinion.


Summaries of

Maric v. Adams

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 5, 2001
749 N.E.2d 289 (Ohio 2001)
Case details for

Maric v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:Maric et al., Appellants, v. Adams et al.; State Farm Mutual Automobile…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 5, 2001

Citations

749 N.E.2d 289 (Ohio 2001)
749 N.E.2d 289

Citing Cases

Davis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.

"[F]or the purpose of determining the scope of coverage of an underinsured motorist claim, the statutory law…

Cross v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

{¶ 26} In response to these holdings of the Supreme Court of Ohio, the General Assembly passed S.B. No. 20,…