From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Margady v. Weissman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1947
272 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Summary

In Jack, the Eighth District Court of Appeals opined that "[t]he great weight of authority in this country holds that the guardian of a mentally incompetent person cannot maintain an action for divorce."

Summary of this case from Broach v. Broach

Opinion

June 16, 1947.


In an action to recover upon an alleged contract of employment, order denying motion to dismiss complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Margady v. Weissman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1947
272 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

In Jack, the Eighth District Court of Appeals opined that "[t]he great weight of authority in this country holds that the guardian of a mentally incompetent person cannot maintain an action for divorce."

Summary of this case from Broach v. Broach
Case details for

Margady v. Weissman

Case Details

Full title:JACK MARGADY, Respondent, v. JACK E. WEISSMAN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1947

Citations

272 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Broach v. Broach

" 33 Ohio Law Abs. at 336, 1934 WL 1286. {¶ 10} Finally, in its ruling dismissing the appellant's divorce…

Boyd v. Edwards

We note that this view of divorce provides the underlying rationale for cases in Ohio which have held that a…