From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marcy v. Roser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: GREEN, A. P. J., HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., AND BALIO, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted the motion of First Choice Realty of Rome, Inc. (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it. Defendant was the listing agency for property purchased by plaintiff from defendant Kenneth F. Roser. After the closing on the property, plaintiff allegedly discovered defects in the well and septic systems. Plaintiff commenced this action against defendants alleging, inter alia, fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment. Defendant met its initial burden by establishing that it had no knowledge of the alleged defects in the well and septic systems ( see, Rudolph v. Turecek, 240 A.D.2d 935, 938, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 811; Hauser v. Lista, 201 A.D.2d 873, 874; Hausler v. Spectra Realty, 188 A.D.2d 722, 724), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see generally, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562).


Summaries of

Marcy v. Roser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Marcy v. Roser

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA J. MARCY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KENNETH F. ROSER, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 339

Citing Cases

Gallagher v. Ruzzine

Finally, we conclude that the court properly dismissed the cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty…