From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marco v. Sachs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1946
270 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

May 20, 1946.


Order denying appellants' motion to make the amended complaint more definite and certain, without prejudice to an application for a bill of particulars, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, the further amended complaint to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Appellants are entitled to have the complaint made more definite by showing the dates upon which the numerous acts alleged to have been committed, pursuant to the alleged conspiracy, took place, so as to enable them to determine whether or not they have a defense under the Statute of Limitations. ( Royle v. McLaughlin, 195 App. Div. 413; Peters v. Huppert, 159 App. Div. 829; Pigone v. Lauria, 115 App. Div. 286; Bennett v. Lawrence, 71 App. Div. 413.) Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marco v. Sachs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1946
270 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Marco v. Sachs

Case Details

Full title:IDA MARCO, as Ancillary Administratrix of the Estate of HARRY MARCO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Symons Galleries, Incorporated v. Phillips

While ordinarily a bill of particulars will properly give information regarding dates, here the acts…

Pearlson v. Javitz

Plaintiffs fail to specify what acts of fraud or undue influence were practiced upon the intestate, nor are…