From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marchbanks v. Liberty Ins. Corp.

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Jun 19, 2020
602 S.W.3d 917 (Tex. 2020)

Opinion

No. 18-0977

06-19-2020

William MARCHBANKS, Petitioner, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Respondent

Ana Ene, John Scott Black, Melissa Waden Wray, Richard D. Daly, Daly & Black, P.C., Matthew Worrall, Worrall Law Group PLLC, Houston, for Petitioner. Richard A. Sheehy, Dawn Arney Moore, John Mark Kressenberg, Shelley Rogers, Travis Cade Armstrong, Sheehy, Ware & Pappas, P.C., Houston, for Respondent.


Ana Ene, John Scott Black, Melissa Waden Wray, Richard D. Daly, Daly & Black, P.C., Matthew Worrall, Worrall Law Group PLLC, Houston, for Petitioner.

Richard A. Sheehy, Dawn Arney Moore, John Mark Kressenberg, Shelley Rogers, Travis Cade Armstrong, Sheehy, Ware & Pappas, P.C., Houston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

At issue in this insurance dispute is whether an insurer's payment of an appraisal award bars an insured's claims under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act (TPPCA), codified as Chapter 542 of the Insurance Code. The court of appeals concluded it did. Because the court of appeals' opinion is inconsistent with our recent decisions on this issue, we now reverse.

William Marchbanks's residential property sustained hail and wind damage. After its first inspection, Liberty Insurance Corp.—Marchbanks's insurance provider—determined that there was no property damage attributable to a storm and therefore denied coverage. Fifteen months later, Marchbanks sought another inspection of his property. In response, Liberty requested information from Marchbanks to reopen his case, and it sent another adjuster to the property. After the second inspection, Liberty valued the damage at $387, which was below the insurance policy's deductible. Liberty did not notify Marchbanks of this denial until almost three months after its decision.

Believing the property damage was still undervalued, Marchbanks sued Liberty, alleging breach of contract and several extra-contractual claims. Six months after Marchbanks filed suit, Liberty successfully moved the trial court to compel appraisal. The appraisal award exceeded Liberty's prior estimates. Liberty paid the award to Marchbanks and subsequently moved for summary judgment on all his claims. The trial court granted Liberty's motion and rendered a take-nothing judgment. The court of appeals affirmed, holding that Liberty's payment of the appraisal award entitled it to summary judgment on Marchbanks's TPPCA claim as a matter of law. 558 S.W.3d 308, 312–13, 316 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2018).

Initially, the trial court granted Liberty's motion for summary judgment in part regarding Marchbanks's claim for breach of contract and severed the remaining extra-contractual claims. The court later granted summary judgment for Liberty regarding the extra-contractual claims on the ground that Liberty's full and timely payment of the appraisal award precluded Marchbanks from recovering on his extra-contractual claims as a matter of law. Marchbanks appealed only the dismissal of his extra-contractual claims.
--------

Marchbanks filed a petition asking this Court to decide whether payment of an appraisal award extinguishes TPPCA liability as a matter of law. Meanwhile, we decided two cases relevant to the issues Marchbanks raises in his petition. In Barbara Technologies Corp. v. State Farm Lloyds , we held that "payment in accordance with an appraisal is neither an acknowledgment of liability nor a determination of liability under the policy for purposes of TPPCA damages under section 542.060." 589 S.W.3d 806, 820 (Tex. 2019). On the same day, we restated in Ortiz v. State Farm Lloyds that "an insurer's payment of an appraisal award does not as a matter of law bar an insured's claims under the Prompt Payment Act." 589 S.W.3d 127, 135 (Tex. 2019).

The court of appeals concluded that, as a matter of law, Marchbanks could not maintain his TPPCA claim due to Liberty's payment of the appraisal award. Under Barbara Technologies and Ortiz , this was error. Without hearing oral argument, see TEX. R. APP. P. 59.1, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case to the trial court to consider Marchbanks's TPPCA claim in light of those decisions.


Summaries of

Marchbanks v. Liberty Ins. Corp.

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Jun 19, 2020
602 S.W.3d 917 (Tex. 2020)
Case details for

Marchbanks v. Liberty Ins. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MARCHBANKS, PETITIONER, v. LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

Date published: Jun 19, 2020

Citations

602 S.W.3d 917 (Tex. 2020)

Citing Cases

Crayton v. Homeowners of Am. Ins. Co.

Those cases, however, did not involve the issues we grapple with here. See Lazos v. State Farm Lloyds, 601…