From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mantilla v. Goldstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 7, 1992
608 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-01740.

August 7, 1992.


Whether a criminal record should be sealed or expunged involves the exercise of judicial discretion, Hernandez v. State, 603 So.2d 105 (Fla.3d DCA 1992), as to which mandamus does not lie. Kloski v. Matecumbe Marina, Inc., 598 So.2d 275 (Fla.3d DCA 1992) (Mandamus not a vehicle to command performance of an act where public officer has discretion).

Mandamus is denied without prejudice to appeal.

NESBITT, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mantilla v. Goldstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 7, 1992
608 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Mantilla v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:JULIO MANTILLA, PETITIONER, v. HON. STANLEY GOLDSTEIN, ETC., RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 7, 1992

Citations

608 So. 2d 828 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)