From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. United States

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 3, 1904
78 P. 92 (Okla. 1904)

Opinion

Filed September 3, 1904.

CRIMINAL LAW — Error Must be Pointed Out — Failure to File Briefs. An appellate court will not search for error, but it is the duty of one appealing, even in a criminal case, to direct the attention of the appellate court to the particular errors complained of.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from the District Court of Caddo County; before F. E. Gillette, Trial Judge.

Mitchell Lane, for plaintiff in error.

Horace Speed, United States Attorney, for defendant in error.


Opinion of the court by


The appellant was convicted of disposing of intoxicating liquors to Indians. He appeals to this court, and prays a reversal of the judgment and sentence. He has filed no briefs. If there is any error in the record it is his duty to point it out to the court. An appellate court will not search for error, and our attention has been called to none.

The judgment of the lower court is hereby affirmed, and it is ordered that it be carried into execution at the cost of the appellant.

Gillette, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.


Summaries of

Manning v. United States

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Sep 3, 1904
78 P. 92 (Okla. 1904)
Case details for

Manning v. United States

Case Details

Full title:TOM MANNING v. THE UNITED STATES

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 3, 1904

Citations

78 P. 92 (Okla. 1904)
78 P. 92

Citing Cases

Price v. State

This rule has always been enforced in Oklahoma. See Wellman v. Territory, 2 Okla. 152, 37 P. 1066; Steil v.…

Hess v. State

This rule has always been enforced in Oklahoma. See Wellman v. Territory, 2 Okla. 152, 37 P. 1066; Steil v.…