From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manning v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 2004
11 A.D.3d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4335

October 19, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered March 6, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff as an infant while in the care of a residential treatment facility, granted defendants' motions to strike plaintiff's bill of particulars dated December 17, 2002, with leave to plaintiff to serve a bill of particulars properly limited to the scope of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Sweeny, JJ.


Plaintiff's bill of particulars alleging no less than six actionable occurrences over a period of no less than six months was properly stricken where the complaint alleges only one occurrence on only one day. We note a prior unappealed order denying a motion by plaintiff to amend the complaint. We decline plaintiff's request to prune the bill.


Summaries of

Manning v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 19, 2004
11 A.D.3d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Manning v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:FRANK MANNING, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and LITTLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 19, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 913

Citing Cases

Maloney v. Meadowbrook Care Center, Inc.

A party may not use his Bill of Particulars to advance new theories of liability not alleged in his…

Behren v. Warren Gorham Lamont, Inc.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Nardelli and Malone, JJ., concur. The amended bill of particulars was…