From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Manhattan Savings Bank v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1944
268 App. Div. 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Opinion

December 22, 1944.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.


Taking into consideration the evidence of all pertinent factors as adduced before the official referee, we find that the fair and reasonable market value of the premises as of the date of sale was $60,000. The Special Term accordingly was warranted in denying the motion for a deficiency judgment. The order so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Order so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Manhattan Savings Bank v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1944
268 App. Div. 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)
Case details for

Manhattan Savings Bank v. Farrell

Case Details

Full title:MANHATTAN SAVINGS BANK, Appellant, v. EDWARD D. FARRELL, JR., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1944

Citations

268 App. Div. 981 (N.Y. App. Div. 1944)

Citing Cases

Trustco Bank v. Eakin

More to the point is the fact that the receiver specifically requested their assistance in securing the…