From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mangum v. Marson Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1977
57 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

April 18, 1977


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 23, 1976, which denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate the automatic dismissal of his action and to restore it to the Trial Calendar, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered May 17, 1976, which dismissed the action on the basis of his default. Appeal from the judgment dismissed. No appeal lies from a judgment entered upon default. Order affirmed. One bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals is awarded to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. There had been a delay of nearly three years between the time the case was marked off the calendar for failure to file a statement of readiness and the day this motion was made. The alleged excuses merely demonstrate that the delay was attributable to neglect by plaintiff or his attorney. Plaintiff has not submitted a sufficient affidavit of merit to warrant restoration of the case to the Trial Calendar (see Keating v Smith, 20 A.D.2d 141; Sortino v Fisher, 20 A.D.2d 25). Cohalan, Acting P.J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mangum v. Marson Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1977
57 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Mangum v. Marson Construction Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN MANGUM, Appellant, v. MARSON CONSTRUCTION CORP. et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1977

Citations

57 A.D.2d 587 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Barry v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Pursuant to CPLR 3216 (subd [e]), plaintiff, not having timely filed a note of issue, was required to present…

Bankers Trust v. Jackson

This reason is insufficient to warrant vacatur of the dismissal. Neglect by the petitioner or its attorney…