From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mangieri v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1998
256 A.D.2d 153 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 15, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.).


Contrary to defendant-appellant's argument, it owed plaintiff a duty of care since, pursuant to its agreement with defendant City of New York, defendant-appellant was solely responsible for the repair and maintenance of the subject golf course and plaintiff, as a golfing patron upon that course, was reasonably within the class of individuals entitled, and, indeed, compelled to rely upon defendant-appellant's satisfactory performance of its exclusive maintenance undertaking ( see, Palka v. Service-master Mgt. Servs. Corp., 83 N.Y.2d 579, 584-590).

Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Mangieri v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 15, 1998
256 A.D.2d 153 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Mangieri v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:FRANK MANGIERI, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and AMERICAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 153 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
681 N.Y.S.2d 520

Citing Cases

Caronna v. Macy's E., Inc.

Courts have held that when a party who contracts "to inspect and repair and possesses the exclusive…