From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maness v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 2, 1975
519 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-1538.

September 2, 1975.

Albert G. Caruana, A.C.L.U. of Fla., Bennett H. Brummer, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, Fla., for petitioner-appellant.

J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., William L. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Peter T. Fay, Judge.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion April 25, 1975, 5 Cir., 512 F.2d 88)


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

It is ordered that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

Maness v. Wainwright

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 2, 1975
519 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1975)
Case details for

Maness v. Wainwright

Case Details

Full title:GARY MANESS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Sep 2, 1975

Citations

519 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1975)

Citing Cases

Welcome v. Vincent

410 U.S. at 294, 302-03, 93 S.Ct. at 1049. See Maness v. Wainwright, 512 F.2d 88, 90-91 (5th Cir.), reh. en…

United States v. Hughes

Fortunately, the confusion will soon be moot; under the Federal Rules of Evidence, statements such as those…