From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mander v. Concreform Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 26, 1968
212 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 37158.

June 26, 1968.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, Ben V. Overton, J.

David T. Henniger of Masterson, Lloyd, Sundberg Rogers, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

E.O. Palermo of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings Evans, Tampa, for respondents.


We have for review on conflict certiorari a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Mander v. Concreform Company, Inc., 206 So.2d 662. This case presents the same issue which was decided in Stone v. Jeffres, Fla., 208 So.2d 827, wherein we held attorneys' fees bear interest from the date of the award thereof by a Deputy Commissioner of the Florida Industrial Commission, unless the award is reversed on review or appeal.

Accordingly, the decision below is quashed and the cause remanded for entry of a judgment in accordance herewith.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C.J., ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Mander v. Concreform Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 26, 1968
212 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Mander v. Concreform Company

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT J. MANDER, PETITIONER, v. CONCREFORM COMPANY, INC., AND BITUMINOUS…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 26, 1968

Citations

212 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1968)

Citing Cases

Metropolitan Dade County v. Rolle

We affirm all issues raised in the main appeal without further comment, but reverse that asserted in the…

Wells Fargo Armored Services v. Lee

We have been unable to find any legal basis for the award of prejudgment interest on fees in workers'…