From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malus v. Sperry-Rand Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 7, 1956
2 A.D.2d 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

November 7, 1956


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. There was error in the charge respecting the failure to call one Haley, but we think the error was not of sufficient consequence to warrant reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial. We may not consider the question of privilege since the defendant did not take the necessary steps to develop the evidence or require the submission of the question to the jury by way of request or exception.

Concur — Peck, P.J., Breitel, Cox, Frank and Bastow, JJ. [See post, p. 967.]


Summaries of

Malus v. Sperry-Rand Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 7, 1956
2 A.D.2d 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Malus v. Sperry-Rand Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MALUS, Respondent, v. SPERRY-RAND CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1956

Citations

2 A.D.2d 877 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

Matter of Rivera v. Coughlin

The petitioner's claim of privilege with respect to his medical records is without merit. A claim of…

Howard Stores v. Robison Rayon

The issue as to mitigation of damages was not raised in the court below or by the appellant on this appeal.…