From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maloney v. Talbot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 2008
55 A.D.3d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-10266.

October 7, 2008.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Patricia Talbot and Joseph Talbot appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), dated March 29, 2007, as denied that branch of their motion which was to vacate the foreclosure sale of the subject premises.

Michael G. McAuliffe, Melville, N.Y., for appellants.

Walsh Markus McDougal DeBellis LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Kevin M. Walsh and Paul R. McDougal of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Covello and Leventhal, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A foreclosure sale may be vacated when fraud, collusion, mistake, or misconduct casts suspicion on the fairness of the sale ( see Chase Manhattan Mtge. Corp. v Cobbs, 4 AD3d 383; see also Guardian Loan Co. v Early, 47 NY2d 515, 520). The appellants failed to establish any such conduct. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of their motion which was to vacate the foreclosure sale.


Summaries of

Maloney v. Talbot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 2008
55 A.D.3d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Maloney v. Talbot

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MALONEY et al., Respondents, v. PATRICIA TALBOT et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 2008

Citations

55 A.D.3d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 7633
864 N.Y.S.2d 319

Citing Cases

LaSalle Bank N.A. v. Munoz

To the degree defendant Jose Munoz asserts the assignment was improper, and he was not provided with notice…

LaSalle Bank N.A. v. Munoz

To the degree defendant Jose Munoz asserts the assignment was improper, and he was not provided with notice…