From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malone v. Husker Auto Group, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Dec 17, 2008
4:08CV3199 (D. Neb. Dec. 17, 2008)

Opinion

4:08CV3199.

December 17, 2008


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (filing 15) recommending that Plaintiff's motion for remand (filing 11) be granted, and that this case be remanded to the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska. No objections to the recommendation have been filed.

I have reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I find that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Inasmuch as Judge Piester has fully, carefully, and correctly found the facts and applied the law, I need only state that Plaintiff's motion for remand (filing 11) should be granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (filing 15) is adopted;
2. Plaintiff's motion for remand (filing 11) is granted;
3. By separate document, judgment shall be entered remanding this case to the District Court of Lancaster County, Nebraska.


Summaries of

Malone v. Husker Auto Group, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Dec 17, 2008
4:08CV3199 (D. Neb. Dec. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Malone v. Husker Auto Group, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TERRY MALONE, Plaintiff, v. HUSKER AUTO GROUP, Inc., a Nebraska…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Dec 17, 2008

Citations

4:08CV3199 (D. Neb. Dec. 17, 2008)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Shantel Krebs Office Capacity

"[A] mere assertion of a deprivation of a federal . . . right is not sufficient to sustain federal…

Stephens v. Stephens

However, even where liberally construing a pro se pleading, "a mere assertion of a deprivation of a federal…