From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malloy v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 503506.

April 24, 2008.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Lavar Malloy, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, RJ., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


A search of petitioner's prison cell recovered several letters which, upon review by a correction officer with specialized training relative to gangs, were determined to include gangrelated references. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of unauthorized organizational materials. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty as charged. That determination was administratively affirmed, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the confiscated letters, along with the testimony adduced at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Velez v Goord, 262 AD2d 906, 906). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claim that the Hearing Officer was biased, and find them to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Malloy v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 24, 2008
50 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Malloy v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAVAR MALLOY, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 24, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 1431 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3553
857 N.Y.S.2d 302

Citing Cases

Kairis v. Fischer

We confirm. To the extent that the petition can be construed as alleging that there is insufficient evidence…

Harvey v. Woods

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with testimony of the correction officer who wrote it as well as…