From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maline v. City of Utica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

December 30, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Parker, J. — Dismiss Pleading.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint against defendant Advanced Absorber Products, Inc. dismissed.

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., LAWTON, PIGOTT, JR., SCUDDER AND CALLAHAN, JJ.


Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant Advanced Absorber Products, Inc. (AAP) to dismiss the complaint against it. AAP established that in 1982 it merged with defendant Keene Corporation (Keene). As a result of the merger, Keene became the owner of all real and personal property ( see, Business Corporation Law § 906 Bus. Corp.[b][2]) and assumed all its "liabilities, obligations and penalties" (Business Corporation Law § 906 Bus. Corp.[b][3]). Consequently, any cause of action that plaintiffs could assert against AAP must be asserted against Keene.


Summaries of

Maline v. City of Utica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1999
267 A.D.2d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Maline v. City of Utica

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MALINE AND SUSAN MALINE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF UTICA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 1022 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
701 N.Y.S.2d 202

Citing Cases

N.Y. State Elec. v. Firstenergy Corp.

Here, because there is no question that AGECO merged these five subsidiaries into NYSEG, NYSEG acquired their…