From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Malerba v. Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 13, 1981
54 N.Y.2d 863 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued September 3, 1981

Decided October 13, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JAMES A. GOWAN, J.

Edward F. Hayes, III, and Raymond J. Clancy for appellants.

Vincent D. McNamara for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum of the Appellate Division. We add only that, assuming that awareness by the police of an impending attack would be sufficient to create a special duty, the affidavit in opposition contains nothing from which such awareness can be inferred and, in any event, because it is by a person other than the one who spoke to the police, would be insufficient on that question (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 563).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Malerba v. Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 13, 1981
54 N.Y.2d 863 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Malerba v. Incorporated Village of Huntington Bay

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT F. MALERBA et al., Appellants, v. INCORPORATED VILLAGE OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 13, 1981

Citations

54 N.Y.2d 863 (N.Y. 1981)
444 N.Y.S.2d 903
429 N.E.2d 410

Citing Cases

Pelaez v. Seide

As a result, we have dismissed most such claims as a matter of law ( see e.g. Lauer, 95 NY2d 95 [2000]…

Yearwood v. Town of Brighton

Michael R. Wolford and Carolyn G. Nussbaum for respondent. Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in…