finding that a similar clause gave the district court the authority to determine whether the plaintiff was entitled to injunctive relief, despite the fact that the parties may have been required to resolve their dispute through arbitration
Summary of this case from Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner v. DunnNo. 97-1208.
March 23, 1998, OCTOBER TERM, 1997.
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 122 F. 3d 936.
finding that a similar clause gave the district court the authority to determine whether the plaintiff was entitled to injunctive relief, despite the fact that the parties may have been required to resolve their dispute through arbitration
Summary of this case from Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner v. DunnFull title:MAKAREWICZ ET AL. v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 23, 1998
This action is one in a long series of actions filed by Plaintiff and is premised on his theory that he is…
Wine Not, Intl. Inc. v. 2atec, LLCEEOC v. Waffle House, Inc., 534 U.S. 279, 289 (2002). On the other hand, arbitration is not to be foisted on…