From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Makaneole v. SolarWorld Indus. Am., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 30, 2017
3:14-CV-01528-PK (D. Or. May. 30, 2017)

Opinion

3:14-CV-01528-PK

05-30-2017

MICHAEL MAKANEOLE, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SOLARWORLD INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC.; SOLARWORLD INDUSTRIES AMERICA, LP; SOLARWORLD INDUSTRIES SERVICES, LLC; SOLARWORLD POWER PROJECTS, INC., RANDSTAD PROFESSIONALS US, LP, and KELLY SERVICES, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#160) on May 10, 2017, in which he recommends the Court deny the Bill of Costs (#153) of Defendant Kelly Services, Inc.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#160). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendant Kelly's Bill of Costs (#153).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 30th day of May, 2017.

/s/ Anna J. Brown

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Makaneole v. SolarWorld Indus. Am., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 30, 2017
3:14-CV-01528-PK (D. Or. May. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Makaneole v. SolarWorld Indus. Am., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MAKANEOLE, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 30, 2017

Citations

3:14-CV-01528-PK (D. Or. May. 30, 2017)

Citing Cases

Gessele v. Jack In The Box, Inc.

As the court noted in Makaneole v. Solarworld Indus. Am., Inc., if representatives in putative wage class…